Amnesty International
calls for a commission of inquiry into 'war on terror' detentions
May 19,
2004
Amnesty International is calling
for an impartial and independent commission of inquiry to be set up by
the United States Congress to conduct a thorough investigation into the
USA's "war on terror" detentions across the globe. Such a commission, composed
of credible experts independent of government, must have broad-ranging
powers to examine the administration's detention policies and practices
and ensure accountability at the highest level.
The investigation must have the full
cooperation of the government. Its purpose must be to ensure that from
now on the USA adopts policies that fully meet its international obligations,
as well as to identify any officials who may have authorized, condoned
or committed war crimes and other human rights abuses in Iraq, Afghanistan,
Guantánamo Bay or elsewhere.
The evidence of war crimes committed
in Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq has followed persistent claims of cruel, inhuman
or degrading treatment against detainees during the past two and a half
years of the "war on terror". The USA continues daily to violate international
law and standards in its detention policy -- by holding detainees outside
the protection of the law, including in Guantánamo, Afghanistan
and in secret locations. Its alleged transfer of detainees to face torture
in third countries has also been a matter of deep concern throughout this
period.
Since the outset of the "war on terror",
the US administration has fostered a climate conducive to torture and cruelty.
A contemptuous approach to international law and standards, the use of
incommunicado and secret detention, and the repeated dehumanization and
labelling of all detainees as "killers" and "terrorists", have created
conditions ripe for torture and other crimes under international law.
Even the International Committee
of the Red Cross (ICRC) has not had full access to all detainees. The military
investigation into Abu Ghraib by Major General Antonio Taguba raised the
situation of "ghost detainees", who were moved around within the facility
to hide them from the ICRC. The ICRC's own report in February on Coalition
detentions in Iraq "establishes that persons deprived of their liberty
face the risk of being subjected to a process of physical and psychological
coercion, in some cases tantamount to torture". Failure to notify relatives
of detainees' whereabouts resulted "in the de facto 'disappearance' of
the arrestee for weeks or even months." The ICRC report also said that
ill-treatment of detainees deemed to have high intelligence value was systematic,
and that the use of solitary confinement in small cells devoid of daylight
against such detainees violated the Geneva Conventions.
The commander of the US forces in
Iraq has now barred interrogators from using some of the "stress and duress"
techniques, reportedly including sleep deprivation, dietary manipulation,
stress positions, and the use of dogs, techniques which Secretary of Defense
Rumsfeld told a Senate hearing on 12 May had been approved at the Pentagon.
Although some such techniques violate the international prohibition on
cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, their use has not been precluded
in interrogations in Afghanistan, Guantánamo or at secret locations.
In an open letter to President Bush
on 7 May 2004, Amnesty International cited the case of a Yemeni national
who told the organization in April that he was subjected to sleep deprivation
and other cruel or degrading treatment by US agents, including being photographed
naked, at a secret detention facility in Kabul. In another recent interview,
a former Afghan police officer has said that he was subjected to beating,
kicking, sleep deprivation, and sexual abuse during the more than a month
he spent in US custody in Afghanistan in 2003. He also said he had been
repeatedly photographed, often while naked.
Last week the New York Times
published evidence that torture -- including water submersion -- has been
used against "high value" detainees at secret locations. The latest edition
of the New Yorker magazine reports that the Secretary of Defense approved
the expansion of a secret operation -- a "special-access program" (SAP)
-- originally for use against such detainees, to prisoners incarcerated
in Iraq in the insurgency there. The secret tactics, it is stated, allowed
for sexual humiliation and physical coercion. The Department of Defense
has issued a general denial of the New Yorker's thorough report, characterizing
it as "outlandish, conspiratorial, and filled with error and anonymous
conjecture", but has not provided a detailed response to the allegations
made.
There is growing evidence that the
abuse of prisoners in US custody has been widespread and resulted from
US policies as well as a leadership failure. However, the administration
continues to claim that only a few soldiers have been responsible. President
Bush himself, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, is promoting this
message. The most appropriate way to get to the bottom of this and to meet
international concern is to establish an expert inquiry independent of
government. To ensure its effectiveness and the appearance of impartiality
in the eyes of the world, the inquiry would benefit form the advice of
international experts such as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on
torture.
Prosecuting the "few" alleged perpetrators
caught on film in Abu Ghraib prison would clearly not be enough. Full accountability,
of persons at all levels of the chain of command, including officers in
the armed forces, Central Intelligence Agency personnel and private contractors,
with no hint of scapegoating of low-level soldiers and reservist officers,
is crucial.
A commission of inquiry must not
be a substitute for bringing to justice anyone who has committed human
rights violations, including war crimes. As a matter of principle, across
all countries, Amnesty International takes the position that justice is
best served by prosecuting war crimes and other grave violations of international
law, such as torture, in independent and impartial civilian courts. Any
trials, however, whether military or civilian, must conform fully to international
standards for fair trial.
The problem does not begin or end
at Abu Ghraib. The rule of law and promotion of security and human rights
demand that daylight be shone onto all US detention policies and practices.
Take action!
Call for independent investigations into war crimes of torture in Iraq:
http://amnesty-news.c.topica.com/maacgq4aa6YPGbd90wNb/
USA: Pattern of brutality and
cruelty in Iraq: http://amnesty-news.c.topica.com/maacgq4aa6YPHbd90wNb/
Guantánamo Bay: a human
rights scandal: http://amnesty-news.c.topica.com/maacgq4aa6YPIbd90wNb/
AI INDEX: AMR 51/087/2004
|