BLOODY APRIL

 
76 U.S. Troops Killed this month
  • General: No More Troops to Send to Iraq

  • Army at breaking point in Iraq
    76 U.S. Troops Killed this month

    U.S. troops suffer record losses
     

    BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Police will return to their posts in the holy city of Najaf after reaching an agreement with the militia of radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, the city's police chief and an al-Sadr spokesman said Monday.

    But a coalition source close to the situation told CNN that police have successfully negotiated the return of only three of their stations in the south-central Iraqi city.

    Al-Sadr's armed Mehdi Army militia-men continue to patrol the streets, according to the source.

    Meanwhile, new U.S. military figures released Monday showed April to be the deadliest month ever for American soldiers engaging in hostile action in Iraq since the war began a year ago.

    At least 76 American troops have died in hostile action this month in Iraq, according to the U.S. military.
     
    SUPPLY TRUCK The new figures were released as foreign hostages in Iraq continued to be held by kidnappers.

    There was no word Monday on the status of kidnapped American contractor Thomas Hamill, who was snatched Friday by insurgents and videotaped by the Australian Broadcasting Corp.

    Seven of Hamill's colleagues at Kellogg, Brown & Root -- an American construction and engineering company -- are unaccounted for in Iraq, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the top

    Iraqis loot a U.S. supply truck after it was attacked on the highway between Baghdad and Fallujah on Monday. U.S. General in Iraq, and he had no further details about the troops or the missing Kellogg, Brown & Root employees.

    But seven Chinese hostages who were captured in Iraq Sunday night were released late Monday, the official Xinhua news agency reported from Beijing.
     

    Agreement in dispute

    The reported agreement in Najaf between coalition forces and militia loyal to al-Sadr was disputed Monday by a coalition source close to the situation.

    Just before police and an al-Sadr spokesman were announcing their agreement, militia fired mortar rounds at the coalition compound in Najaf, the source said.

    The city of Kufa is also still under Sadr's control, Iraqi sources said.

    "If the coalition forces pull out of Najaf, then we will help the local security and let them perform their duties," said Qais Al-Khazaaly, a spokesman for al-Sadr.

    Ali Hadi, police chief of Najaf, said police would be "back at their posts to enforce law and order" and that al-Sadr's Mehdi Army would pull out of police stations and government buildings.

    The battle with al-Sadr's forces began earlier this month after the coalition shut down his newspaper, Al Hawza, for allegedly inciting violence and then arresting an aide on charges of complicity in the murder last year of another Shiite cleric.

    An Iraqi judge has also issued a warrant for al-Sadr's arrest, and the top U.S. general in the region said that whatever happens to him is up to the Iraqis.
     

    Death toll increases

    Although U.S. military figures showed April to be the deadliest month of the war in hostile incidents -- 76 -- more U.S. troops died in November -- 81. Twelve of the November deaths were non-hostile incidents.

    Twenty-six of the 76 troops killed in April died between Friday and Sunday, the military said.

    Thirteen of the 26 dead American soldiers were killed Friday, the coalition said. Four servicemen died Saturday and another nine died Sunday, the U.S. military said.

    Those deaths include three Marines who were killed in fighting west of Baghdad on Sunday and two U.S. Army pilots whose Apache helicopter was shot down Sunday in the same region, according to the Coalition Public Information Center.

    The new figures bring the number of U.S. troops killed in Operation Iraqi Freedom to 674 -- 480 hostile and 194 non-hostile, according to the U.S. military.

    President Bush on Monday said the United States must defend ordinary Iraqis against "gangs that were trying to take the law into their own hands."

    "The Iraq people are on the side of the transition to a peaceful country," Bush said at a news conference near his ranch in Crawford, Texas, with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. "We just can't let ... a small percentage of the Iraqi people decide the fate of everyone."
     

    Company worker kidnapped

    A member of the Iraqi Governing Council -- Muhsin Abdul Hameed -- said Monday that Muslim clerics had issued a religious decree against abductions and that kidnappers may release their hostages later in the day.

    One of the hostages, Hamill, 43, was working as a contractor truck driver at the time he was abducted.

    Kidnappers demanded that U.S. forces withdraw from the Iraqi city of Fallujah by 10 p.m. Saturday ET, but since then there has been no word on his fate.

    Kidnappers warned that Hamill would "be treated worse than the four Americans that were killed in Fallujah" -- a reference to the four civilians whose mutilated bodies were dragged through the city's streets -- if their demand was not met.

    Friends and neighbors of Hamill held a vigil Sunday night in his Mississippi hometown. (Full story)

    The rash of civilian kidnappings continued Sunday night, with the seven Chinese men abducted by gunmen in central Iraq who were reportedly freed Monday. (Full story)

    A separate deadline for three Japanese hostages also passed with no word. The kidnappers threatened to burn the Japanese hostages alive Sunday unless Japan pulls its troops out of Iraq.

    U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney has begun a first round of meetings with Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi in the midst of the crisis over the Japanese civilians being held hostage in Iraq.

    Senior administration officials said Cheney was to use his meeting with Koizumi to press him to stay the course in Iraq and not bow to the increasing pressure to bring the troops home. (Full story)

    Two Arabs working for aid agencies are also being held by militants, one a Syrian-born Canadian and the other a resident of Jerusalem.

    Militants released British citizen Gary Teeley on Sunday night, and Al-Jazeera aired video of eight civilians, identified as hostages, being released, including people from Pakistan, the Philippines, India and Turkey.

    However, while a voice on the tape said the eight had worked for coalition forces and were being set free at the request of Sunni clerics, no government agencies could confirm that they had actually been taken hostage.
     

      Sun Apr 11, 2004
     

    General: No More Troops to Send to Iraq

    The new issue of Time magazine (April 19) features an article "What Should Bush Do?" featuring three people giving advice on Iraq.

    General Barry McCaffrey says "There are no more U.S. troops to send to Iraq. That's why we need 80,000 or more troops added to the U.S. Army. Congress is allowing Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to dig in his heels and try to maintain a foreign policy based on a grossly undermanned U.S. military."

    Given the plans of the neocon-run foreign policy team at the White House, Gen. McCaffrey's estimate of 80,000 troops needed is probably very conservative.

    Gen. McCaffrey wants Rummy to activate more reserve troops, but after they run out....

    Here are General McCaffrey's comments:

    When a grass fire first starts, you can jump right in the middle of it and stomp it out. But if you wait too long, it just becomes uncontrollable. We should immediately jump onto the opposition and end it, and then launch smart diplomatic moves to get NATO and the U.N. and other Arab forces involved in a bigger way. 

    There are no more U.S. troops to send to Iraq. That's why we need 80,000 or more troops added to the U.S. Army. Congress is allowing Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to dig in his heels and try to maintain a foreign policy based on a grossly undermanned U.S. military. The key question isn't whether the 1st Cavalry Division is going to get run out of Baghdad‹it's not. The key question is, if you've got 70% of your combat battalions in the U.S. Army deployed in Afghanistan, Iraq, South Korea and elsewhere, can you maintain this kind of muscular presence in that many places? The answer is no. But if we take action now to increase the size of the Army by 80,000 soldiers, we'll be able to handle this global reach. The key would be to activate nine National Guard brigades in the next 18 months and convert them into active-duty soldiers, allowing the reservists to go back to their communities. 

    The transfer of political authority on June 30 is extremely premature. By that date, there will not be a sovereign government with any political legitimacy. And here's another challenge we face: we need to put the training of Iraqi security services‹the police, army, border patrol and others‹solely under the control of the U.S. military instead of the Coalition Provisional Authority and give these Iraqi recruits more money. Iraq is costing us $4 billion a month, and only a tiny percent of that has gone directly to support the creation of Iraqi security forces. We should also transfer authority for security policy in Iraq from Rumsfeld to Secretary of State Colin Powell because the most important tasks are now diplomatic.

    We need to invest two to 10 years in Iraq, and we'll have a good outcome. But if we think we're dumping this responsibility in the coming year, we're going to end up with a mess on our hands that will severely impair our international role for the coming 20 years. 
     

    Copyright 2003 Antiwar.com

    Sun 11 Apr 2004 
     

    Army at breaking point in Iraq 
     

    BRIAN BRADY 
    WESTMINSTER EDITOR 

    TONY Blair is to send hundreds more British troops to Iraq in a bid to prevent the south of the country descending into bloodletting and anarchy, Scotland on Sunday can reveal. 

    But the proposal to reinforce the UK force in Iraq with an extra 700 soldiers was condemned by government critics last night as taking British forces up to - and even beyond - breaking point. 

    Despite the warnings, military planners are desperately attempting to scrape together another 700 troops to back up the existing British force of 11,000 in and around Basra. The back-up force will travel to the country when power is handed back to the Iraqi people in three months' time. 

    The move was sanctioned after British commanders in Basra warned that they would need more help if the security situation elsewhere in Iraq continued to deteriorate. 

    American and British commanders have agreed the entire UK force will stay in the south, rather than travel north to combat insurgents, because the continued security of the Basra area is essential to the overall prospects of maintaining peace in Iraq. 

    Despite the reinforcements, Blair is this week expected to tell President Bush in Washington that - with a quarter of UK forces already serving in various trouble spots around the world - he cannot commit any more troops to the struggle for order in Iraq. 

    Blair is also likely to urge United Nations secretary-general Kofi Annan to "be more aggressive" in demanding international involvement in the transfer of power on June 30, and pave the way for UN peace-keeping troops to share the burden of policing the divided nation. 

    Yesterday, fierce fighting continued across Iraq between American forces and insurgents from both the Sunni and Shi'ite populations. However, in Fallujah, a temporary halt to the vicious conflict was called by the US, allowing members of the Iraqi Governing Council to hold talks with gunmen. 

    But with no real prospect of an end to the violence, Bush is already urging several countries, including France and Germany, to promise to send 1,500 troops dedicated to protecting UN staff in Iraq, in a bid to persuade Annan to restore the UN presence in Iraq in time for the handover. 

    The international force would allow the UN to oversee elections in Iraq, leading to a peaceful handover of sovereignty on June 30, but it would also relieve the burden on the US and the UK, the major partners in the coalition force currently occupying the country. 

    The appeal for help from other countries follows months of complaints that Washington had excluded the international community from the post-Saddam reconstruction of Iraq. 

    Downing Street sources conceded that Blair would appeal to Annan to back the efforts to get the international community on board during a meeting in New York on Thursday. 

    One source said the UN "should be more proactive" in demanding its involvement in the reconstruction programme, the humanitarian effort and, eventually, the provision of peacekeeping troops on the ground. 

    He added: "The objective is to make it clear that if the UN wants to have a role in Iraq it has to be more aggressive in getting involved. 

    "The UN has criticised what is happening in Iraq, and it has criticised the Americans in particular, but it hasn't been aggressive enough in telling the US what it [the UN] can do, and what it wants to do." 

    The furious diplomatic activity lying ahead of Blair was revealed as it emerged that senior staff at the army's permanent joint planning headquarters in Northwood, Middlesex, have been ordered to thrash out plans for sending another battalion to Iraq to keep the peace during the handover period. 

    One Ministry of Defence insider told Scotland on Sunday that the hurried attempts to assemble a provisional force of 600-700 troops was sanctioned following concerned requests from British commanders in the field in Iraq. 

    The revelation comes as British politicians and military commanders have complained about "overstretch" in a 200,000-strong armed force which already has more than 50,000 military personnel stationed abroad. 

    Army chief General Sir Michael Walker last month warned that British forces were currently recuperating from the battle to topple Saddam, and would not be able to mount a similar operation for at least four years. 

    The standard two-year break between operational duties had been reduced to 10 months. 

    Tory defence spokesman Gerald Howarth said the reinforcements might seem "prudent", but added: "Our guys are already massively overstretched in Iraq and around the world, and they are desperately short on training. 

    "If we send another battalion, and more after that if this is ramped up further, how are we going to fill the gaps that are opening up elsewhere? We don't have enough numbers as it is, and the people we do have are not getting the time to get the proper training to do the job." 

    An MoD spokesman confirmed that the deployment in Iraq was "constantly under review", but refused to comment on plans for an increased presence.

    copyright news.scotsman.com

     
    sources
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/12/iraq.main/index.html
    http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=P725
    http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=410322004
    remembering
    Joseph Suell
    remembering
    Dennis O'Brien
    coming home
    wounded
    coming home
    grieving
    news
    page
    not just numbers not just numbers coming home
    hub page
    site map
    antiwar/pro g.i.
    submit any
    memorial