76 U.S. Troops Killed this monthGeneral: No More Troops to Send to Iraq
Army at breaking point in Iraq
| 76 U.S. Troops Killed
this month
U.S. troops suffer record losses
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Police will return to their posts in the holy
city of Najaf after reaching an agreement with the militia of radical Shiite
cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, the city's police chief and an al-Sadr spokesman
said Monday.
But a coalition source close to the situation told CNN that police have
successfully negotiated the return of only three of their stations in the
south-central Iraqi city.
Al-Sadr's armed Mehdi Army militia-men continue to patrol the streets,
according to the source.
Meanwhile, new U.S. military figures released Monday showed April to
be the deadliest month ever for American soldiers engaging in hostile action
in Iraq since the war began a year ago.
At least 76 American troops have died in hostile action this month in
Iraq, according to the U.S. military.
There was no word Monday on the status of kidnapped American contractor
Thomas Hamill, who was snatched Friday by insurgents and videotaped by
the Australian Broadcasting Corp.
Seven of Hamill's colleagues at Kellogg, Brown & Root -- an American
construction and engineering company -- are unaccounted for in Iraq, Lt.
Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the top But seven Chinese hostages who were captured in Iraq Sunday night were
released late Monday, the official Xinhua news agency reported from Beijing.
Agreement in dispute
The reported agreement in Najaf between coalition forces and militia
loyal to al-Sadr was disputed Monday by a coalition source close to the
situation.
Just before police and an al-Sadr spokesman were announcing their agreement,
militia fired mortar rounds at the coalition compound in Najaf, the source
said.
The city of Kufa is also still under Sadr's control, Iraqi sources said.
"If the coalition forces pull out of Najaf, then we will help the local
security and let them perform their duties," said Qais Al-Khazaaly, a spokesman
for al-Sadr.
Ali Hadi, police chief of Najaf, said police would be "back at their
posts to enforce law and order" and that al-Sadr's Mehdi Army would pull
out of police stations and government buildings.
The battle with al-Sadr's forces began earlier this month after the
coalition shut down his newspaper, Al Hawza, for allegedly inciting violence
and then arresting an aide on charges of complicity in the murder last
year of another Shiite cleric.
An Iraqi judge has also issued a warrant for al-Sadr's arrest, and the
top U.S. general in the region said that whatever happens to him is up
to the Iraqis.
Death toll increases
Although U.S. military figures showed April to be the deadliest month
of the war in hostile incidents -- 76 -- more U.S. troops died in November
-- 81. Twelve of the November deaths were non-hostile incidents.
Twenty-six of the 76 troops killed in April died between Friday and
Sunday, the military said.
Thirteen of the 26 dead American soldiers were killed Friday, the coalition
said. Four servicemen died Saturday and another nine died Sunday, the U.S.
military said.
Those deaths include three Marines who were killed in fighting west
of Baghdad on Sunday and two U.S. Army pilots whose Apache helicopter was
shot down Sunday in the same region, according to the Coalition Public
Information Center.
The new figures bring the number of U.S. troops killed in Operation
Iraqi Freedom to 674 -- 480 hostile and 194 non-hostile, according to the
U.S. military.
President Bush on Monday said the United States must defend ordinary
Iraqis against "gangs that were trying to take the law into their own hands."
"The Iraq people are on the side of the transition to a peaceful country,"
Bush said at a news conference near his ranch in Crawford, Texas, with
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. "We just can't let ... a small percentage
of the Iraqi people decide the fate of everyone."
Company worker kidnapped
A member of the Iraqi Governing Council -- Muhsin Abdul Hameed -- said
Monday that Muslim clerics had issued a religious decree against abductions
and that kidnappers may release their hostages later in the day.
One of the hostages, Hamill, 43, was working as a contractor truck driver
at the time he was abducted.
Kidnappers demanded that U.S. forces withdraw from the Iraqi city of
Fallujah by 10 p.m. Saturday ET, but since then there has been no word
on his fate.
Kidnappers warned that Hamill would "be treated worse than the four
Americans that were killed in Fallujah" -- a reference to the four civilians
whose mutilated bodies were dragged through the city's streets -- if their
demand was not met.
Friends and neighbors of Hamill held a vigil Sunday night in his Mississippi
hometown. (Full story)
The rash of civilian kidnappings continued Sunday night, with the seven
Chinese men abducted by gunmen in central Iraq who were reportedly freed
Monday. (Full story)
A separate deadline for three Japanese hostages also passed with no
word. The kidnappers threatened to burn the Japanese hostages alive Sunday
unless Japan pulls its troops out of Iraq.
U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney has begun a first round of meetings
with Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi in the midst of the crisis
over the Japanese civilians being held hostage in Iraq.
Senior administration officials said Cheney was to use his meeting with
Koizumi to press him to stay the course in Iraq and not bow to the increasing
pressure to bring the troops home. (Full story)
Two Arabs working for aid agencies are also being held by militants,
one a Syrian-born Canadian and the other a resident of Jerusalem.
Militants released British citizen Gary Teeley on Sunday night, and
Al-Jazeera aired video of eight civilians, identified as hostages, being
released, including people from Pakistan, the Philippines, India and Turkey.
However, while a voice on the tape said the eight had worked for coalition
forces and were being set free at the request of Sunni clerics, no government
agencies could confirm that they had actually been taken hostage.
|
| Sun Apr 11, 2004
General: No More Troops to Send to
Iraq
The new issue of Time magazine (April 19) features an article "What
Should Bush Do?" featuring three people giving advice on Iraq.
General Barry McCaffrey says "There are no more U.S. troops to send
to Iraq. That's why we need 80,000 or more troops added to the U.S. Army.
Congress is allowing Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to dig in his
heels and try to maintain a foreign policy based on a grossly undermanned
U.S. military."
Given the plans of the neocon-run foreign policy team at the White
House, Gen. McCaffrey's estimate of 80,000 troops needed is probably very
conservative.
Gen. McCaffrey wants Rummy to activate more reserve troops, but after
they run out....
Here are General McCaffrey's comments:
When a grass fire first starts, you can jump right in the middle of
it and stomp it out. But if you wait too long, it just becomes uncontrollable.
We should immediately jump onto the opposition and end it, and then launch
smart diplomatic moves to get NATO and the U.N. and other Arab forces involved
in a bigger way.
There are no more U.S. troops to send to Iraq. That's why we need 80,000
or more troops added to the U.S. Army. Congress is allowing Secretary of
Defense Donald Rumsfeld to dig in his heels and try to maintain a foreign
policy based on a grossly undermanned U.S. military. The key question isn't
whether the 1st Cavalry Division is going to get run out of Baghdad‹it's
not. The key question is, if you've got 70% of your combat battalions in
the U.S. Army deployed in Afghanistan, Iraq, South Korea and elsewhere,
can you maintain this kind of muscular presence in that many places? The
answer is no. But if we take action now to increase the size of the Army
by 80,000 soldiers, we'll be able to handle this global reach. The key
would be to activate nine National Guard brigades in the next 18 months
and convert them into active-duty soldiers, allowing the reservists to
go back to their communities.
The transfer of political authority on June 30 is extremely premature.
By that date, there will not be a sovereign government with any political
legitimacy. And here's another challenge we face: we need to put the training
of Iraqi security services‹the police, army, border patrol and others‹solely
under the control of the U.S. military instead of the Coalition Provisional
Authority and give these Iraqi recruits more money. Iraq is costing us
$4 billion a month, and only a tiny percent of that has gone directly to
support the creation of Iraqi security forces. We should also transfer
authority for security policy in Iraq from Rumsfeld to Secretary of State
Colin Powell because the most important tasks are now diplomatic.
We need to invest two to 10 years in Iraq, and we'll have a good outcome.
But if we think we're dumping this responsibility in the coming year, we're
going to end up with a mess on our hands that will severely impair our
international role for the coming 20 years.
Copyright 2003 Antiwar.com |
| Sun 11 Apr 2004
Army at breaking point in Iraq
BRIAN BRADY
TONY Blair is to send hundreds more British troops to Iraq in a bid
to prevent the south of the country descending into bloodletting and anarchy,
Scotland on Sunday can reveal.
But the proposal to reinforce the UK force in Iraq with an extra 700
soldiers was condemned by government critics last night as taking British
forces up to - and even beyond - breaking point.
Despite the warnings, military planners are desperately attempting to
scrape together another 700 troops to back up the existing British force
of 11,000 in and around Basra. The back-up force will travel to the country
when power is handed back to the Iraqi people in three months' time.
The move was sanctioned after British commanders in Basra warned that
they would need more help if the security situation elsewhere in Iraq continued
to deteriorate.
American and British commanders have agreed the entire UK force will
stay in the south, rather than travel north to combat insurgents, because
the continued security of the Basra area is essential to the overall prospects
of maintaining peace in Iraq.
Despite the reinforcements, Blair is this week expected to tell President
Bush in Washington that - with a quarter of UK forces already serving in
various trouble spots around the world - he cannot commit any more troops
to the struggle for order in Iraq.
Blair is also likely to urge United Nations secretary-general Kofi Annan
to "be more aggressive" in demanding international involvement in the transfer
of power on June 30, and pave the way for UN peace-keeping troops to share
the burden of policing the divided nation.
Yesterday, fierce fighting continued across Iraq between American forces
and insurgents from both the Sunni and Shi'ite populations. However, in
Fallujah, a temporary halt to the vicious conflict was called by the US,
allowing members of the Iraqi Governing Council to hold talks with gunmen.
But with no real prospect of an end to the violence, Bush is already
urging several countries, including France and Germany, to promise to send
1,500 troops dedicated to protecting UN staff in Iraq, in a bid to persuade
Annan to restore the UN presence in Iraq in time for the handover.
The international force would allow the UN to oversee elections in Iraq,
leading to a peaceful handover of sovereignty on June 30, but it would
also relieve the burden on the US and the UK, the major partners in the
coalition force currently occupying the country.
The appeal for help from other countries follows months of complaints
that Washington had excluded the international community from the post-Saddam
reconstruction of Iraq.
Downing Street sources conceded that Blair would appeal to Annan to
back the efforts to get the international community on board during a meeting
in New York on Thursday.
One source said the UN "should be more proactive" in demanding its involvement
in the reconstruction programme, the humanitarian effort and, eventually,
the provision of peacekeeping troops on the ground.
He added: "The objective is to make it clear that if the UN wants to
have a role in Iraq it has to be more aggressive in getting involved.
"The UN has criticised what is happening in Iraq, and it has criticised
the Americans in particular, but it hasn't been aggressive enough in telling
the US what it [the UN] can do, and what it wants to do."
The furious diplomatic activity lying ahead of Blair was revealed as
it emerged that senior staff at the army's permanent joint planning headquarters
in Northwood, Middlesex, have been ordered to thrash out plans for sending
another battalion to Iraq to keep the peace during the handover period.
One Ministry of Defence insider told Scotland on Sunday that the hurried
attempts to assemble a provisional force of 600-700 troops was sanctioned
following concerned requests from British commanders in the field in Iraq.
The revelation comes as British politicians and military commanders
have complained about "overstretch" in a 200,000-strong armed force which
already has more than 50,000 military personnel stationed abroad.
Army chief General Sir Michael Walker last month warned that British
forces were currently recuperating from the battle to topple Saddam, and
would not be able to mount a similar operation for at least four years.
The standard two-year break between operational duties had been reduced
to 10 months.
Tory defence spokesman Gerald Howarth said the reinforcements might
seem "prudent", but added: "Our guys are already massively overstretched
in Iraq and around the world, and they are desperately short on training.
"If we send another battalion, and more after that if this is ramped
up further, how are we going to fill the gaps that are opening up elsewhere?
We don't have enough numbers as it is, and the people we do have are not
getting the time to get the proper training to do the job."
An MoD spokesman confirmed that the deployment in Iraq was "constantly
under review", but refused to comment on plans for an increased presence.
copyright news.scotsman.com |
|
| remembering
Joseph Suell |
remembering
Dennis O'Brien |
coming
home
wounded |
coming
home
grieving |
news
page |
| not just numbers | not just numbers | coming
home
hub page |
site
map
antiwar/pro g.i. |
submit
any
memorial |