The Phoenix Program, Revisited
ABCs of American Interrogation Methods
By DOUGLAS VALENTINE
continued
from page
one
Inside a
PIC
One story high, fashioned from concrete blocks,
poured cement, and wood in the shape of a hollow square, a PIC was four
buildings with tin roofs linked around a courtyard. In the center of the
yard was a combination lookout-water tower with an electric generator under
it. "You couldn't get the guards to stay out there at night if they didn't
have lights," Muldoon explained. "So we had spotlights on the corners,
along the walls, and on the tower shooting out all around. We also bulldozed
around it so there were no trees or bushes. Anybody coming at it could
be seen crossing the open area." People entered and exited through green,
steel-plated gates, "Which were wide open every time I visited," said Muldoon,
who visited the PICs only during the day. "You didn't want to visit at
night," when attacks occurred. PICs were located on the outskirts of town,
away from residential areas, so as not to endanger the people living nearby,
as well as to discourage rubbernecking. "These were self-contained places,"
Muldoon emphasized. Telephone lines to the PICs were tapped by the CIA.
On the left side were interrogation rooms and the
cellblock; depending on the size, twenty to sixty solitary confinement
cells the size of closets. Men and women were not segregated. "You could
walk right down the corridor," according to Muldoon. "It was an empty hallway
with cells on both sides. Each cell had a steel door and a panel at the
bottom where you could slip the food in and a slot at the top where you
could look in and see what the guy was doing." There were no toilets, just
holes to squat over. "They didn't have them in their homes." Muldoon laughed.
"Why should we put them in their cells?"
Prisoners slept on concrete slabs. "Depending on
how cooperative they were, you'd give them a straw mat or a blanket. It
could get very cold at night in the highlands." A system of rewards and
punishments was part of the treatment. "There were little things you could
give them and take away from them, not a lot, but every little bit they
got they were grateful for." Depending on the amount of VCI activity in
the province and the personality of the PIC chief, some interrogation centers
were always full while others were always empty. In either case, "We didn't
want them sitting there talking to each other," Muldoon said, so "we would
build up the cells gradually, until we had to put them next to each other.
They were completely isolated. They didn't get time to go out and walk
around the yard. They sat in their cells when they weren't being interrogated.
After that they were sent to the local jail or were turned back over to
the military, where they were put in POW camps or taken out and shot. That
part I never got involved in," he said, adding that they "were treated
better in the PICs than in the local jails for common criminals. Public
Safety was advising them, working with the National Police. Sometimes they
had sixty to seventy people in a cell that shouldn't have had more than
ten. But they didn't care. If you're a criminal, you suffer. If you don't
like it, too bad. Don't be a criminal."
The CIA interrogation process worked like this.
"As we brought prisoners in, the first thing we did was run them through
the shower. That's on the left as you come in. After that they were checked
by the doctor or nurse. That was an absolute necessity because God knows
what diseases they might be carrying with them. They might need medication.
They wouldn't do you much good if they died the first day they were there
and you never got a chance to interrogate them. That's why the medical
office was right inside the main gate. In most PICs," Muldoon noted, "the
medical staff was usually a local South Vietnamese Army medic who would
come out and check the prisoners coming in that day." After the prisoner
was cleaned, examined, repaired, weighed, photographed, and fingerprinted,
his biography was taken by a Special Branch officer in the debriefing room.
This initial interrogation extracted "hot" information that could be immediately
exploited-the whereabouts of an ongoing Communist party committee meeting,
for example, as well as the basic information needed to come up with requirements
for the series of interrogations that followed. Then the prisoner was given
a uniform and stuck in a cell.
The interrogation rooms were at the back of the
PIC. Some had two-way mirrors and polygraph machines, although sophisticated
equipment was usually reserved for regional interrogation centers, where
expert CIA staff interrogators could put them to better use. Most province
liaison officers were not trained interrogators. "They didn't have to be,"
according to Muldoon. "They were there to collect intelligence, and they
had a list of what they needed in their own province. All they had to do
was to make sure that whoever was running the PIC followed their orders.
All they had to say was: `This is the requirement I want.' Then they read
the initial reports and went back and gave the Special Branch interrogators
additional requirements, just like we did at the NIC."
The guards lived in the PIC. As they returned from
duty, they stacked their weapons in the first room on the right. The next
room was the PIC chief's office, with a safe for classified documents,
handguns, and his bottle of scotch. The PIC chief's job was to "turn" captured
VCI into double agents, and maintain informant networks in the hamlets
and villages. Farther down the corridor were offices for interrogators,
collation and report writers, translator-interpreters, and clerical and
kitchen staff. There were file rooms with locked cabinets and map rooms
for tracking the whereabouts of VCI in the province. And there was a room
where defectors were encouraged to become counter-terrorists.
Once an interrogation center had been constructed
and a staff assigned, Muldoon summoned the training team from the NIC.
Each member of the team was a specialist. The Army captain trained the
guards. Air Force Sergeant Frank Rygalski taught report writers how to
write proper reports. There were standard reporting formats for tactical
as opposed to strategic intelligence and for agent reports. To compile
a finished report, an interrogator's notes were reviewed by the chief interrogator,
then collated, typed, copied and sent to the Special Branch, CIO, and CIA.
Translations were never considered totally accurate unless read and confirmed
in the original language by the same person, but that rarely happened.
Likewise, interrogations conducted through interpreters were never considered
totally reliable, for significant information was generally lost or misrepresented.
An Air Force sergeant, Dick Falke, taught interrogators
how to take notes and ask questions during an interrogation. "You don't
just sit down with ten questions, get ten answers, then walk away," Muldoon
said. "Some of these guys, if you gave them ten questions, would get ten
answers for you, and that's it. A lot of them had to learn that you don't
drop a line of questioning just because you got the answer. The answer,
if it's the right one, should lead you to sixty more questions. For example,"
he said, "Question one was: `Were you ever trained in North Vietnam?' Question
two was `Were you ever trained by people other than Vietnamese?' Well,
lots of times the answer to question two is so interesting and gives you
so much information you keep going for an hour and never get to question
three: `When did you come to South Vietnam?"'
Special Branch officers in region interrogation
centers were sent to a special interrogation-training program conducted
at the NIC by experts from the CIA's Support Services Branch, most of whom
had worked on Russian defectors and were brought out from Washington to
handle important cases. Training of Special Branch administrative personnel
was conducted at region headquarters by professional secretaries, who taught
their students how to type, file, and use phones.
According to Muldoon, the Special Branch had "the
old French methods." That means interrogation that included torture. "All
this had to be stopped by the agency," he said. "They had to be re-taught
with more sophisticated techniques." In Ralph Johnson's opinion, "the Vietnamese,
both Communist and GVN, looked upon torture as a normal and valid method
of obtaining intelligence."' But of course, the Vietnamese did not conceive
the PICs; they were the stepchildren of Robert Thompson, whose aristocratic
English ancestors perfected torture in dingy castle dungeons, on the rack
and in the iron lady, with thumbscrews and branding irons.
As for the American role, according to Muldoon,
"you can't have an American there all the time watching these things."
"These things" included: rape, gang rape, rape
using eels, snakes, or hard objects, and rape followed by murder; electrical
shock ("the Bell Telephone Hour") rendered by attaching wires to the genitals
or other sensitive parts of the body, like the tongue; "the water treatment";
"the airplane," in which a prisoner's arms were tied behind the back and
the rope looped over a hook on the ceiling, suspending the prisoner in
midair, after which he or she was beaten; beatings with rubber hoses and
whips; and the use of police dogs to maul prisoners. All this and more
occurred in PICs, one of which was run by Congressman Rob Simmons (R-CT)
while he was the CIA officer running the PIC in Phu Yen Province in 1972.
"The PIC adviser's job was to keep the region officer
informed about real operations mounted in the capital city or against big
shots in the field," Muldoon said, adding that advisers who wanted to do
a good job ran the PICs themselves, while the others hired assistants (contractors)
who were paid by the CIA but worked for themselves, doing a dirty job in
exchange for a line on the inside track to the black market.
Apart from being known as torture chambers, PICs
are also faulted for producing only information on low-level VCI. Whenever
a VCI member with strategic information (for example, a cadre in Hue who
knew what was happening in the Delta) was captured, he was immediately
grabbed by the region interrogation center, or the NIC in Saigon, where
expert CIA interrogators could produce quality reports for Washington.
The lack of feedback to the PIC for its own province operations resulted
in a revolving door syndrome, wherein the PIC was reduced to picking up
the same low-level people month after month.
"A lot of PICs didn't produce anything because
the (CIA advisors) in the provinces didn't push them," Muldoon said. "Some
of them said, `It's not that we didn't try; it's just that it was a dumb
idea in the first place, because we couldn't get the military, who were
the ones capturing prisoners, to turn them over. The military weren't going
to turn them over to us until they were finished with them, and by then
they were washed out.'
"This," Muldoon conceded, "was part of the overall
plan: Let the military get the tactical military intelligence first. Obviously
that's the most important thing going on in a war. But then we felt that
after the military got what they could use tomorrow or next week, maybe
the CIA should talk to this guy. That was the whole idea of having the
Province Intelligence Coordination Committees and why the PICs became part
of them, so we could work this stuff back and forth. And in provinces where
our guys went out of their way to work with the MACV sector adviser, they
were able to get something done."
The Military's
Side of the Story
The military's side of the story is given by Major
General Joseph McChristian, who arrived in Saigon in July 1965 as the military's
intelligence chief. McChristian recognized the threat posed by the VCI
and, in order to destroy it, proposed "a large countrywide counterintelligence
effort involved in counter sabotage, counter subversion and counterespionage
activities."' In structuring this attack against the VCI, McChristian assigned
military intelligence detachments to each US Army brigade, division, and
field force, as well as to each South Vietnamese division and corps. He
created combined centers for intelligence, document exploitation, interrogation,
and materiel exploitation and directed them to support and coordinate allied
units in the field. And he ordered the construction of military interrogation
centers in each sector, division, and corps.
McChristian readily conceded the primacy of the
CIA in anti-VCI operations. He acknowledged that the military did not have
the CIA's sophisticated agent nets, and that military advisers at sector
level focused on acquiring tactical intelligence needed to mount offensive
operations. But he was very upset when the CIA, "without coordination with
MACV, took over control of the files on the infrastructure located" in
the PICs. He got an even bigger shock when he "was refused permission to
see the infrastructure file by a member of the [CIA]." Indeed, because
the CIA prevented the military from entering the PICs, the military retaliated
by refusing to send them prisoners. As a result, anti-VCI operations were
poorly coordinated at province level.'
Meanwhile, the military assigned intelligence teams
to the provinces, which formed agent nets mainly through South Vietnamese
forces under military control. These advisory teams sent reports to the
political order of battle section in the Combined Intelligence Center,
which "produced complete and timely intelligence on the boundaries, location,
structure, strengths, personalities and activities of the Communist political
organization, or infrastructure. Information filtering into the Combined
Intelligence Center was placed in an automatic database, which enabled
analysts to compare known VCI offenders with known aliases. Agent reports
and special intelligence collection programs provided the military with
information on low-level VCI, while information on high-level VCI came
from the Combined Military Interrogation Center, which, according to McChristian,
was the "focal point of tactical and strategic exploitation of selected
human sources.""
The Military's
Side of the Story
The military's side of the story is given by Major
General Joseph McChristian, who arrived in Saigon in July 1965 as the military's
intelligence chief. McChristian recognized the threat posed by the VCI
and, in order to destroy it, proposed "a large countrywide counterintelligence
effort involved in counter sabotage, counter subversion and counterespionage
activities."' In structuring this attack against the VCI, McChristian assigned
military intelligence detachments to each US Army brigade, division, and
field force, as well as to each South Vietnamese division and corps. He
created combined centers for intelligence, document exploitation, interrogation,
and materiel exploitation and directed them to support and coordinate allied
units in the field. And he ordered the construction of military interrogation
centers in each sector, division, and corps.
McChristian readily conceded the primacy of the
CIA in anti-VCI operations. He acknowledged that the military did not have
the CIA's sophisticated agent nets, and that military advisers at sector
level focused on acquiring tactical intelligence needed to mount offensive
operations. But he was very upset when the CIA, "without coordination with
MACV, took over control of the files on the infrastructure located" in
the PICs. He got an even bigger shock when he "was refused permission to
see the infrastructure file by a member of the [CIA]." Indeed, because
the CIA prevented the military from entering the PICs, the military retaliated
by refusing to send them prisoners. As a result, anti-VCI operations were
poorly coordinated at province level.'
Meanwhile, the military assigned intelligence teams
to the provinces, which formed agent nets mainly through South Vietnamese
forces under military control. These advisory teams sent reports to the
political order of battle section in the Combined Intelligence Center,
which "produced complete and timely intelligence on the boundaries, location,
structure, strengths, personalities and activities of the Communist political
organization, or infrastructure. Information filtering into the Combined
Intelligence Center was placed in an automatic database, which enabled
analysts to compare known VCI offenders with known aliases. Agent reports
and special intelligence collection programs provided the military with
information on low-level VCI, while information on high-level VCI came
from the Combined Military Interrogation Center, which, according to McChristian,
was the "focal point of tactical and strategic exploitation of selected
human sources.""
By mid-1966 U.S. military intelligence employed
about a thousand agents in South Vietnam, all of whom were paid through
the 525th's Intelligence Contingency Fund.
The 525th had a headquarters unit, one battalion
for each corps, and one working with third countries. The 525th had unilateral
teams working without the knowledge or approval of the GVN. Operational
teams consisted of five enlisted men, each one an agent handler reporting
to an officer who served as team chief. When assigned to the field, agent
handlers in unilateral teams lived on their own, "on the economy." To avoid
"flaps," they were given identification as Foreign Service officers or
employees of private American companies, although they kept their military
IDs for access to classified information, areas, and resources. Upon arriving
in South Vietnam, each agent handler (aka case officer) was assigned a
principal agent, who usually had a functioning agent network already in
place. Some of these nets had been set up by the French, the British, or
the Chinese. Each principal agent had several subagents working in cells.
Like most spies, subagents were usually in it for the money; in many cases
the war had destroyed their businesses and left them no alternative.
Case officers worked with principal agents through
interpreters and couriers. In theory, a case officer never met subagents.
Instead, each cell had a cell leader who secretly met with the principal
agent to exchange information and receive instructions, which were passed
along to the other subagents. Some subagents were political specialists;
others attended to tactical military concerns. Posing as woodcutters or
rice farmers or secretaries or auto mechanics, subagents infiltrated Vietcong
villages or businesses and reported on NLF associations, VCI cadres, and
the GVN's criminal undertakings as well as on the size and whereabouts
of VC and NVA combat units.
Case officers handling political "accounts" were
given requirements, originated at battalion headquarters, by their team
leaders. The requirements were for specific information on individual VCI.
The cell leader would report on a particular VCI to the principal agent,
who would pass the information back to the case officer using standard
tradecraft methods, such as a cryptic mark on a wall or telephone pole
that the case officer would periodically look for. The case officer would,
upon seeing the signal, send a courier to retrieve the report from the
principal agent's courier at a prearranged time and place. The case officer
would then pass the information to his team leader as well as to other
customers, including the CIA liaison officer at "The Embassy House," as
CIA headquarters in a province was called.
The finished products of positive and counterintelligence
operations were called army information reports. Reports and agents were
rated on the basis of accuracy, but insofar as most agents were in it for
money, accuracy was hard to judge. A spy might implicate a person who owed
him money or a rival in love, business, or politics. Many sources were
double agents, and all agents were periodically given lie detector tests.
For protection they were also given code names. They were paid through
the Military Intelligence Contingency Fund, but not well enough to survive
on their salaries alone, so many dabbled in the black market, too.
The final stage of the intelligence cycle was the
termination of agents, for which there were three methods. First was termination
by paying the agent off, swearing him to secrecy, and saying so long. Second
was termination with prejudice, which meant ordering an agent out of an
area and placing his or her name on a blacklist so he or she could never
work for the United States again; third was termination with extreme prejudice,
applied when the mere existence of an agent threatened the security of
an operation or other agents. Military Intelligence officers were taught,
in off-the-record sessions, how to terminate their agents with extreme
prejudice.
CIA officers received similar instruction.
Douglas Valentine
is the author of The Hotel Tacloban, The Phoenix Program,
and TDY. His fourth book, The Strength of the Wolf: The Federal
Bureau of Narcotics, 1930-1968, is newly published by Verso.
For information about Mr.
Valentine, and his books and articles, please visit his web sites at www.DouglasValentine.com
and http://members.authorsguild.net/valentine this article first appeared
in CounterPunch copyright Douglas Valentine
|